> > Abe-
> >
> > It is a well-established point of logical method
> > that if the inital assumptions of a scientific or philosophical
> > discourse can be proven to be false, then the validity of the entire
> > document is then nullified.
> >
> > Given this knowledge, if we are willing to concede
> > that the lead singer of
> > Hoobastank is, in fact, a perfect person, can we
> > then disregard all of his whining thereafter?
> >
> > -W McD.
Will, you bring up a point which bears examination, especially since there has been such a ruckus surrounding Mr. Robb and his supposed perfection. A quick glance at internet chat rooms and tribute websites reveals a startlingly common belief that, as you suggest, "the lead singer of Hoobastank is, in fact, a perfect person".
While finding scientific proof of this would be difficult (who would pay for such research?), it can be argued that those who follow the band, and especially those groupies who have studied Mr. Robb's chiseled features at length, can make the best judgment as to the level of perfection he has attained.
A quick glance at this photo from a January gig near Robb’s hometown in Northern Greenland is inconclusive.
Nobody worth their journalistic salt would attempt to draw conclusions of such magnitude from one piece of evidence, especially a wholly inconclusive piece of evidence. So I continued my search, in hopes that someone somewhere had done some of the preliminary research so I could simply lift it for this essay. I did find this pic, which only serves to further muddy the waters:
I grew tired in my search for the answer, Will. But you know what they say: ‘the early dolphin gets the net.’ So I pressed on in my research, when at last I found the smoking gun I needed:
The whole idea of Hoobastank is perfect, really. You've got four indistinct, telegenic, nameless pretty-boys playing catchy, flawless, faux-agressive rock. They are a 99x programmer's dream. Their songs are passionate in the Pro Tools passion-plugin kind of way, and their lyrics are surgically generic--perfect for today's modern rock station. I would contend that Mr. Robb's perfection has spread like a sanitized Norwalk virus to his bandmates and the entire corporate rock vessel he captains. "The Reason" is arguably the most perfect rock ballad since Poison lamented "instead of makin' love, we both made our separate ways."
In answer to your question, Mr. McDaniel: I believe that yes, we can disregard all his subsequent whining and psycho-relational mumbo-jumbo because his opening line is, in fact, patently false. The question I return to you, Mr. McDaniel, is why a perfect person would even bother with it. Is it possible to be perfect and perfectly untrue at once? How could perfection be as banal as this song suggests? This, my friend, is the real mystery.
abe,
thank you for your grunt work--you have saved me countless hours.
Posted by: jeremy at August 25, 2004 02:54 PMno problem, jeremy. i also have pieces on jack wagner, dan fogelberg, bread, and gino vanelli. let me know if you need them.
Posted by: abe at August 25, 2004 03:09 PMjack wagner please.
Posted by: natalie at August 26, 2004 03:35 PMmr. robb looks like he has down syndrome to me.
Posted by: Jonathan at September 1, 2004 02:39 PMimpossible. that doesn't sound very perfect.
Posted by: abe at September 2, 2004 01:37 AMi'm a little behind with this comment,
but does the fact that in the song he actually claims that he is NOT a perfect person make him more or less perfect?
In one sense it takes away any perceived boastfulness (which some might claim as imperfection). In another, if he really is perfect, claiming he's not is lying and therefore an imperfection.
Posted by: levy at November 11, 2004 11:10 AMgood questions, levy. i wonder the same thing. on one hand, if he is perfect, how could he lie so blatantly?
on the other hand, if he is not perfect, how could he be so damned perfect?
Posted by: abe at November 13, 2004 06:29 PM