The GOP leadership is trying to sell a "green" agenda that really is not that green. Read on...
GOP Split by Environment Strategy
By Gannett News Service
Tuesday 23 March 2004
Talking points rile moderates as party looks to fight with
Democrats
WASHINGTON -- Republican House leaders are warning their members
that "Democrats will hit us hard on the environment" this election
year.
Their advice? Tell voters that global warming has not been proved,
that there are no clear links between air pollution and childhood
asthma and that America's rivers and lakes aren't nearly as
polluted as
the Environmental Protection Agency says they are.
Moderate Republicans fear the "talking points" in a memo from the
House Republican Conference could make their party appear
indifferent to the health threats of smoggy skies or
mercury-contaminated fish. And that could hurt them in tight races
where
they must appeal to middle-of-the-road voters.
Vermont Sen. Jim Jeffords, who left the Republican Party in 2001 to
become an independent partly because he didn't think the GOP
was pro-environment, called the memo "outlandish" and an attempt to
deceive voters. He said he hopes moderate Republicans will
help thwart the conservatives strategy.
Republican House leaders recently sent the memo to GOP press
secretaries to use to beat back accusations from Democrats and
conservation groups that Republicans are anti-environment. The memo
charges Democrats with trying to hype pollution problems to
frighten voters into supporting them.
Among the memo's assertions: "Global warming is not a fact,"
"links
between air quality and asthma in children remain cloudy" and
the EPA is exaggerating when it says at least 40 percent of U.S.
streams, rivers and lakes are too polluted for drinking, fishing or
swimming.
"Republicans can't stress enough that extremists are screaming
Doomsday! when the environment is actually seeing a new and
better day," says the Feb. 4 memo put out by the communications office
of the House Republican Conference.
Every GOP House member belongs to the conference, which is led by
Speaker Dennis Hastert of Illinois, Majority Leader Tom DeLay
of Texas, Whip Roy Blunt of Missouri and conference chairwoman Deborah
Pryce of Ohio.
But the leaders' message is meeting resistance from Republican
centrists, who dispute key details and don't like its tone.
Rep. Mike Castle, R-Del., who won high marks from the League of
Conservation Voters for his pro-environment votes, says the
strategy is too negative and defensive and doesn’t address the fact
that
pollution continues to be a health threat.
"If I tried to follow these talking points at a town hall meeting
with my constituents, I'd be booed," said Castle, who heads a group
of
69 moderate House members, senators and governors.
The communications director for the Republican House Conference
said
lawmakers don't have to use the talking points.
"It's up to our members if they want to use them or not," said
Greg
Crist. "We're not stuffing it down their throats."
He said the memo was spurred by concerns that environmental groups
were using myths about the poor state of the environment to
try to make Republicans look bad.
"We wanted to show how the environment has been improving," Crist
said. "We wanted to provide the other side of the story."
But Jeffords -- the ranking member on the Senate Environment and
Public Works Committee -- said the memo distorts reality.
"It's so incredible that they have this denial of any
responsibility
for the serious situation we have in this country as far as the
environment goes," Jeffords said. "They have a head-in-the-sand
approach
to it. They're just sloughing off the human health impacts --
the premature deaths and asthma attacks caused by power plant
pollution."
The Vermont senator said he believes moderate Republicans -- such
as
Castle in the House and Sens. Olympia Snowe of Maine
and Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island -- won't go along with the plan.
Jeffords and Snowe recently introduced legislation to increase
funding to fight water pollution.
"We have hopes that there are enough people in Congress who care
more about the people hurt by pollution than about the money
polluters give to political campaigns," Jeffords said.
The memo's statement that the link between air pollution and
childhood asthma is cloudy is what really upset one leader of a group
of pro-environment Republicans, including elected officials.
Pretty sad, huh?
Posted by Dennis at March 29, 2004 12:06 AMWhat a blunder.
"The links between air quality and asthma in children remains cloudy."
I can see MoveOn.org putting out an ad that directly quotes this line...
My child has asthma, and her asthma attacks decreased significantly when we left Central California. Why? Hmmm... probably because that region has some of the worst air pollution in the country!
Posted by: Mark Kittel at March 29, 2004 12:30 PM